The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa

Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Case law is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For illustration, a ruling in the California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

fourteen. From the light of your position explained higher than, it is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is recognized plus the employee is found guilty after thanks process of legislation, it is the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is just not satisfactory however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful manner. Read more

Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is accessible in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete absent case laws on pre arrest bail with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more

Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, and so they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and never abduct. Read more

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *